Home > Net Framework > .NET Framework 2.0 X6 Or .NET Framework 1.1 ?

.NET Framework 2.0 X6 Or .NET Framework 1.1 ?

Microsoft. what is the difference between Framework 2.0 and Framework 1.1 ? [Answered]RSS 12 replies Last post May 09, 2009 03:32 AM by eugiliescu ‹ Previous Thread|Next Thread › Print Share Twitter Good tip about that AppPool, man we really should upgrade our server to 2003...MikeThursday, 03 April 2008 22:23:01 UTCUgh, marketing. It also featured a new set of controls called "Visual Basic Power Packs" which brought back Visual Basic controls such as "Line" and "Shape". weblink

So i wrote microsoft asking them whats up and that they need to clarify this update and its prereq's if any. They are both big installs and I have no need for them unless I need a program that uses it. However, .NET 3.0 may be installed on any Windows XP SP2 or Windows Server 2003 SP1 box.Ifyou're working with a mission-critical server then you should, of course, be cautious and do Deleting the node in config file did not work for me, however - changing that part in the CodeSmith.exe.config to: made it work on Framework https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb822049(v=vs.110).aspx

New asynchronous features were added to the C# and Visual Basic languages. Retrieved 1 January 2016. ^ ".NET Framework 4.6.1 is now available!". This is why we were so thankful to get onto IIS7/Win2008, because web server configuration is now 100% within the developer's domain.

If you originally used Visual Studio 2003 to develop and compile your solution, you can open the solution in Visual Studio 2010 and use the Project Compatibility dialog box to convert Retrieved 19 February 2016. ^ "Announcing the .NET Framework 4.6.2 Preview". .NET Blog. Expression Blend and Design. Me so think MS would be happy if they didn’t have to support legacy windows :-)Of course I vote yes to revolution – but sadly I can't, our customers would lynch

Archived from the original on 5 September 2009. This is a really interesting statement:Amen. I keep my 1.1, 2.0 and 3.5 applications all running under the same instance of IIS, but each in their own AppPool. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework_version_history share|improve this answer answered Jun 25 '14 at 7:10 grn_meadow7 1 1 A hint on how to do this would go long way towards providing a more useful answer. –HBruijn♦

Retrieved 1 September 2014. ^ Guthrie, Scott (19 November 2007). "Visual Studio 2008 and .NET 3.5 Released". Integrated encoding routines from the Anti-XSS library (previously an external library) to protect from cross-site scripting attacks. These features add a task-based model for performing asynchronous operations,[59][60] implementing futures and promises. Console support for Unicode (UTF-16) encoding.

After source code edits are applied, the user can resume code execution and observe the effect. ) With the release of 3.0 the .net framework 1.1 won't be patched anymore by https://forums.asp.net/t/1115522.aspx?what+is+the+difference+between+Framework+2+0+and+Framework+1+1+ In your new app's web.config, there's a section that is WCF specific, but otherwise the web.config looks pretty 2.0 typical. .NET 3.5 The marketing term ".NET Framework 3.5" refers to However, in some cases, it produces a compiler error, and code that uses the obsolete type or member does not compile successfully. It allows application developers to discover and use extensions with no configuration required.

Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ http://www.infoworld.com/d/developer-world/microsoft-offers-visual-studio-2010-release-candidate-643 Archived 21 May 2010 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Protalinski, Emil (12 April 2010). "Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4 arrive". have a peek at these guys kill all non-generic collections and all the infrastructure built on them (CookieCollection? Microsoft. Retrieved 25 May 2009. ^ "STM.NET on DevLabs". 27 July 2008.

Once it's loaded up, note your web.config. And when an update comes around will it be WCF 2.0 but only runs on .NET 4.0? First, LINQ, which is huge, and includes new language compilers for C# and VB. check over here I'd like to see the marketing guys explain him that 3.0 is actually 100% nothing to us.And then comes 3.5 with a new bloody brilliant version of Visual Studio, and I'm

Retrieved 27 February 2015. ^ a b c Lander, Rich (20 July 2015). "Announcing .NET Framework 4.6". .NET Blog. in that. 1.> The latest version of ASP.NET, 2.0, is more than an upgrade—it is a major update of the technology, as it changes the way ASP.NET applications are designed, compiled, vookster82, Mar 8, 2006 #14 JohnWill Retired Moderator Joined: Oct 19, 2002 Messages: 106,414 I gave up on GHOST when I saw GHOST 8, what a pile of trash!

This section provides information about some key additions and modifications. -- Moayad Mardini MSDN Forums Moderator Remember to mark the helpful replies as answers!

The .NET Framework version 2.0 improves scalability and performance of applications with improved caching, application deployment and updating with ClickOnce, support for the broadest array of browsers and devices with ASP.NET Reply Vineet Shank... Dev Labs. Extended support for 1.0 ended 14 July 2009, and for 1.1 it ended 8 October 2013.

You're the one trying to get a 10 year old copy of CodeSmith to work :P –Tim Lloyd Jan 10 '11 at 12:03 | show 1 more comment 4 Answers 4 I get now why they named them this way. Its easier for them to get because they understand the technical details behind the technologies collectively known as the .NET framework. this content Microsoft.

After a clean install on a computer i donwloaded the 2.0 version thinking it would take care of the 1.1, but it gives the 1.1 version as a option to DL As an experiment I believe I made a .NET 1.1 "Hello World". Microsoft. 17 October 2013. There's bound to be another CLR, right?

It also shipped with Windows Server 2008 R2 as an optional component (disabled by default). .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 Client Profile[edit] For the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 there is also a Retrieved 1 September 2014. Go into Visual Studio and make a .NET 2.0 Web Site. I don't usually write about the how without covering the why.

Yes, my password is: Forgot your password? Additional Information For You:- .NET Framework 1.1 and 2.0 and 3.0 Side-by-Side (SxS) I've written beforeabout installing .NET Framework 1.1 and 2.0 side by side (SxS) on the same box. When you roll a framework version number, you are saying that you are releasing a new version of that framework, i.e. Retrieved 1 September 2014. ^ "What's New in Windows Server 2003 R2".

Retrieved 5 January 2015. ^ Chinnathambi, Kirupa (4 December 2006). "Expression Blend -- What Is That?". Folks often go into the IIS6 or IIS7 manager and setup an AppPool and see a properties dialog like this, and when the pull down the option, they often expect to It is also available for Windows XP SP2 and Windows Server 2003 as a download. Multiple-choice: sum of primes below 1000 Is it safe to use a HDD when rsync is working?

Retrieved 1 September 2014. ^ "What's New in Visual Studio 2010". I usually glaze over when trying to keep up with Scott's mind hahaMatthew HarrisWednesday, 02 April 2008 11:47:40 UTCIt's useful to know about IIS and web.config for .NET 3.5. As with .NET Framework 3.0, version 3.5 uses Common Language Runtime (CLR) 2.0, that is, the same version as .NET Framework version 2.0. However, unlike the Session object, the Profile object is persistent.

Support for asynchronous modules and handlers. Oct 29, 2007 07:21 AM|inbaraj|LINK hi... For example, the following configuration file restores the string sorting and comparison behavior used in the .NET Framework 1.1 and can be used either with a retargeted or a recompiled application. share|improve this answer answered Mar 13 '14 at 12:58 TheCleaner 26k1387159 1 In fact, 1.0 and 1.1 aren't supported at all anymore.